Last reviewed: May 2026 · Contains affiliate links

Secureframe vs Thoropass (2026): ISO 42001 Coverage, Pricing, and Verdict

Head to head

DimensionSecureframeThoropass
Starting price~€7,000/yr~€12,000/yr (bundled)
ISO 42001 support◐ Partial◐ Partial
EU AI Act support◐ Partial◐ Partial
Frameworks76
Audit support modelAuditor partner networkAudit bundled
Free trialNoNo
Implementation time10–16 weeks10–16 weeks
Score8.0/107.9/10

ISO 42001 coverage

Secureframe. ISO 42001 framework added in 2025 with strong control mapping. AI risk assessment workflow is a recent addition.

Thoropass. ISO 42001 framework with integrated audit delivery model. Coverage of Annex A is comprehensive when audit is bundled.

EU AI Act coverage

Secureframe. Provider obligations covered. Deployer obligations and GPAI requirements still being expanded.

Thoropass. EU AI Act controls available. Bundled audit option supports formal conformity assessment for high-risk systems.

Pricing

Secureframe. Starting at ~€7,000/yr. Single framework, audit guidance included.

Thoropass. Starting at ~€12,000/yr (bundled). ISO 42001 framework, evidence collection.

Implementation

Secureframe. Implementation timelines align with Drata: 10 to 14 weeks for ISO 42001 as a first framework. The in-house audit team is a notable accelerant for organisations without prior certification experience.

Thoropass. When audit is bundled, total time from kickoff to certification typically runs 16 to 22 weeks. The platform configuration phase is shorter because evidence requirements are pre-aligned with the auditor.

Verdict

Thoropass wins when the buyer wants a single contract covering both the compliance platform and the ISO 42001 certification audit. Secureframe is the better choice for organisations that already have an audit partner and want richer policy templates and a broader framework library.

Our recommendation: Thoropass for the primary use case discussed above. The other tool remains a strong choice in the segments listed in its full review.