Sprinto vs Secureframe (2026): ISO 42001 Coverage, Pricing, and Verdict
Head to head
| Dimension | Sprinto | Secureframe |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | ~€4,500/yr | ~€7,000/yr |
| ISO 42001 support | ◐ Partial | ◐ Partial |
| EU AI Act support | ◐ Partial | ◐ Partial |
| Frameworks | 5 | 7 |
| Audit support model | Auditor partner network | Auditor partner network |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Implementation time | 10–16 weeks | 10–16 weeks |
| Score | 7.8/10 | 8.0/10 |
ISO 42001 coverage
Sprinto. ISO 42001 framework available since Q4 2025. Coverage is solid for cloud-native AI systems but limited for on-premise or hybrid deployments.
Secureframe. ISO 42001 framework added in 2025 with strong control mapping. AI risk assessment workflow is a recent addition.
EU AI Act coverage
Sprinto. EU AI Act controls mapped against the published text. Some interpretive guidance is left to the customer.
Secureframe. Provider obligations covered. Deployer obligations and GPAI requirements still being expanded.
Pricing
Sprinto. Starting at ~€4,500/yr. Single framework, up to 50 employees.
Secureframe. Starting at ~€7,000/yr. Single framework, audit guidance included.
Implementation
Sprinto. Sprinto's onboarding is among the fastest in the category, typically 8 to 12 weeks to audit readiness. The trade-off is less flexibility for organisations with unusual control environments.
Secureframe. Implementation timelines align with Drata: 10 to 14 weeks for ISO 42001 as a first framework. The in-house audit team is a notable accelerant for organisations without prior certification experience.
Verdict
Secureframe wins when audit guidance matters and the buyer lacks internal compliance expertise. Sprinto wins on price and onboarding speed for cloud-native teams that can self-direct.
Our recommendation: Secureframe for the primary use case discussed above. The other tool remains a strong choice in the segments listed in its full review.